Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:55:53PM +0300, Fancer's opinion wrote: > Hello, folks > Regarding the no_bootmem patchset I've sent earlier. > I'm terribly sorry about huge delay with response. I got sucked in a new > project, so just didn't have a time to proceed with the series, answer to the > questions and resend the set. > If it is still relevant and needed for community, I can get back to the series > on the next week, answer to the Mett's questions (sorry, man, for doing it so > long), rebase it on top of the kernel 4.18 and resend the new version. We also > can try to combine it with this patch, if it is found convenient. So, what would be the best way to move forward? > Regards, > -Sergey > > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 20:20 Paul Burton, <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Any comments on this? > > I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger > series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed > another revision: > > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&; > state=* > > Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is > enough. > > Thanks, > Paul > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
