On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Prasad Joshi wrote: > Thanks a lot for your reply. I should have seen your mail before > sending 23 mails :( > I will make the changes suggested by you and will resend all of the > patches again. > Thanks for taking this effort on. A couple other points: - each patch should have a different subject prefixed with the subsystem that it touches (for example: "x86: add gfp flags variant of pte_alloc_one") and the maintainers should be cc'd. Check scripts/get_maintainer.pl or the MAINTAINERS file. Also, for changes that touch all arch code you'll want to cc linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as well. - each change needs to have a proper changelog prior to your signed-off-by line to explain why the change is being done and in preparation for supporting non-GFP_KERNEL allocations from __vmalloc(). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>