Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:30:08 +0900
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20180731111519.GH4557@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <9158a23e-7793-7735-e35c-acd540ca59bf@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <20180730144647.GX24267@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180730145425.GE1206094@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <0018ac3b-94ee-5f09-e4e0-df53d2cbc925@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <20180730154424.GG1206094@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <20180730185110.GB24267@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180730191005.GC24267@dhcp22.suse.cz> <6f433d59-4a56-b698-e119-682bb8bf6713@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <20180731050928.GA4557@dhcp22.suse.cz> <b03f09c2-f749-9c80-b4f6-d0b4a9634013@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <20180731111519.GH4557@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 2018/07/31 20:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> I will send the patch to Andrew if the patch is ok. 
>>
>> Andrew, can we send the "we used to have a sleeping point in the oom path but this has
>> been removed recently" patch to linux.git ?
> 
> This can really wait for the next merge window IMHO.
> 

"mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer" in linux-next.git is reviving that sleeping point.
Current "mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer" will not be sent to linux.git in the next
merge window? I'm confused...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Michal Hocko

References:
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Tetsuo Handa
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Tejun Heo
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Tetsuo Handa
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Tejun Heo
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Tetsuo Handa
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Tetsuo Handa
- Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
  - From: Michal Hocko

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: terminate the reclaim early when direct reclaiming
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH resend] powerpc/64s: fix page table fragment refcount race vs speculative references
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at should_reclaim_retry().
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]