On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 2:46 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > What are your plans to have... > > > > 4d2b25f630c7 locking/atomics: Instrument cmpxchg_double*() > > f9881cc43b11 locking/atomics: Instrument xchg() > > df79ed2c0643 locking/atomics: Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation > > 00d5551cc4ee locking/atomics/x86: Reduce arch_cmpxchg64*() instrumentation > > > > ...for example in Linux 4.18 or 4.17.y? > > I have no plans to have these backported. If they help us compile with clang, we'll backport to 4.17, 4.14, 4.9, and 4.4 stable. From https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/3#issuecomment-408839428, it sounds like that is the case. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
