On Mon 30-07-18 15:51:45, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 30.07.2018 15:30, Pavel Tatashin wrote: [...] > > Hi David, > > > > Have you figured out why we access struct pages during hot-unplug for > > offlined memory? Also, a panic trace would be useful in the patch. > > __remove_pages() needs a zone as of now (e.g. to recalculate if the zone > is contiguous). This zone is taken from the first page of memory to be > removed. If the struct pages are uninitialized that value is random and > we might even get an invalid zone. > > The zone is also used to locate pgdat. > > No stack trace available so far, I'm just reading the code and try to > understand how this whole memory hotplug/unplug machinery works. Yes this is a mess (evolution of the code called otherwise ;) [1]. Functionality has been just added on top of not very well thought through bases. This is a nice example of it. We are trying to get a zone to 1) special case zone_device 2) recalculate zone state. The first shouldn't be really needed because we should simply rely on altmap. Whether it is used for zone device or not. 2) shouldn't be really needed if the section is offline and we can check that trivially. [1] on the other hand I can see why people were reluctant to understand the mess and rather tweak their tiny thing on top... -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
