On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:35:35AM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > OK, this looks definitely better. I will have to check that all the > > required state is initialized properly. Considering the above > > explanation I would simply fold the follow up patch into this one. It is > > not so large it would get hard to review and you would make it clear why > > the work is done. > > I will review this work, once Oscar combines patches 4 & 5 as Michal suggested. I will send a new version tomorrow with some fixups and patch4 and patch5 joined. Thanks -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3
