On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > oom_reaper used to rely on the oom_lock since e2fe14564d33 ("oom_reaper: > close race with exiting task"). We do not really need the lock anymore > though. 212925802454 ("mm: oom: let oom_reap_task and exit_mmap run > concurrently") has removed serialization with the exit path based on the > mm reference count and so we do not really rely on the oom_lock anymore. > > Tetsuo was arguing that at least MMF_OOM_SKIP should be set under the > lock to prevent from races when the page allocator didn't manage to get > the freed (reaped) memory in __alloc_pages_may_oom but it sees the flag > later on and move on to another victim. Although this is possible in > principle let's wait for it to actually happen in real life before we > make the locking more complex again. > > Therefore remove the oom_lock for oom_reaper paths (both exit_mmap and > oom_reap_task_mm). The reaper serializes with exit_mmap by mmap_sem + > MMF_OOM_SKIP flag. There is no synchronization with out_of_memory path > now. > > Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>