On 07/17/2018 06:49 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> This is in preparation to accomadate a differing size register
> across architectures.
This is pretty fugly, and reading it again, I wonder whether we should
have just made it 64-bit, at least in all the printk's. Or even
prink("pk reg: %*llx\n", PKEY_FMT_LEN, pkey_reg);
But, I don't _really_ care in the end.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
