Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/17/2018 08:54 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>
>>> If these per-cpu data is something like per-cpu refcounters,
>>> which are using to manage reclaimable objects (e.g. cgroup css objects).
>>> Of course, they are not always reclaimable, but in certain states.
>>
>> BTW, seems you seem interested, could you provide some more formal
>> review as well? Others too. We don't need to cover all use cases
>> immediately, when the patchset is apparently stalled due to lack of
>> review. Thanks!
> 
> Sure!

Thanks!

> The patchset looks sane at a first glance, but I need some time
> to dig deeper. Is v2 the final version?

There was a fixlet on top and some added changelog text, so I'll do a v3
tomorrow incorporating that to make things easier for everyone.

> Thanks!
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux