I have figured out what is going with x86-32. Since it has FLATMEM
memory layout, the memmap is now allocated after zero_resv_unavail():
Now, we have something like this:
zero_resv_unavail()
free_area_init_node()
#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
alloc_node_mem_map()
#endif
At the time when zero_resv_unavail() is called, memmap for
FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is not yet allocated. On the other hand,
alloc_node_mem_map() calls memblock_virt_alloc_node_nopanic() which
calls memset(0), so zero_resv_unavail()
is not needed for this layout.
The fix is:
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5d800d61ddb7..9ec34218713b 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6847,7 +6847,9 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long
*max_zone_pfn)
/* Initialise every node */
mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
setup_nr_node_ids();
+#ifndef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
zero_resv_unavail();
+#endif
for_each_online_node(nid) {
pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
free_area_init_node(nid, NULL,
This is just a temporary fix, I will do a proper fix later, when I
will get rid of zero_resv_unavail(), but that will require more
thinking, on how to ensure that no section in memmap is skipped while
we go through memmap_init_zone().
Should I submit an updated patch for "mm: zero unavailable pages
before memmap init", or just this incremental fix?
Thank you,
Pavel
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:56 AM Pavel Tatashin
<pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have reproduced the problem on mainline. Use x86_32 defcontig +
> qemu, and problem is reproduced immediately. I will send an update
> once I figure out what is going on.
>
> Pavel
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:02 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:54:51AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > > > On 15/07/18 01:32, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> > > > > mainline/master boot: 177 boots: 2 failed, 174 passed with 1 conflict (v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f)
> > > > >
> > > > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f/
> > > > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f/
> > > > >
> > > > > Tree: mainline
> > > > > Branch: master
> > > > > Git Describe: v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f
> > > > > Git Commit: f353078f028fbfe9acd4b747b4a19c69ef6846cd
> > > > > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > > > Tested: 67 unique boards, 25 SoC families, 21 builds out of 199
> > > > >
> > > > > Boot Regressions Detected:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > x86:
> > > > >
> > > > > i386_defconfig:
> > > > > x86-celeron:
> > > > > lab-mhart: new failure (last pass: v4.18-rc4-147-g2db39a2f491a)
> > > > > x86-pentium4:
> > > > > lab-mhart: new failure (last pass: v4.18-rc4-147-g2db39a2f491a)
> > > >
> > > > Please see below an automated bisection report for this
> > > > regression. Several bisections were run on other x86 platforms
> > > > with i386_defconfig on a few revisions up to v4.18-rc5, they all
> > > > reached the same "bad" commit.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately there isn't much to learn from the kernelci.org
> > > > boot logs as the kernel seems to crash very early on:
> > > >
> > > > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/branch/master/kernel/v4.18-rc5/
> > > > https://storage.kernelci.org/mainline/master/v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f/x86/i386_defconfig/lab-mhart/lava-x86-celeron.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It looks like stable-rc/linux-4.17.y is also broken with
> > > > i386_defconfig, which tends to confirm the "bad" commit found by
> > > > the automated bisection which was applied there as well:
> > > >
> > > > https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.17.y/kernel/v4.17.6-68-gbc0bd9e05fa1/
> > >
> > > Adding Greg directly to the CCs due to the stable impact, not deleting
> > > context for his benefit.
> >
> > Hey, I read all stable emails, who else would? :)
> >
> > > > The automated bisection on kernelci.org is still quite new, so
> > > > please take the results with a pinch of salt as the "bad" commit
> > > > found may not be the actual root cause of the boot failure.
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps!
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > > Guillaume
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------8<--------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bisection result for mainline/master (v4.18-rc4-160-gf353078f028f) on x86-celeron
> > > >
> > > > Good: 2db39a2f491a Merge branch 'i2c/for-current' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux
> > > > Bad: f353078f028f Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
> > > > Found: e181ae0c5db9 mm: zero unavailable pages before memmap init
> > > >
> > > > Checks:
> > > > revert: PASS
> > > > verify: PASS
> > > >
> > > > Parameters:
> > > > Tree: mainline
> > > > URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > > Branch: master
> > > > Target: x86-celeron
> > > > Lab: lab-mhart
> > > > Config: i386_defconfig
> > > > Plan: boot
> > > >
> > > > Breaking commit found:
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > commit e181ae0c5db9544de9c53239eb22bc012ce75033
> > > > Author: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Sat Jul 14 09:15:07 2018 -0400
> > > >
> > > > mm: zero unavailable pages before memmap init
> > > > We must zero struct pages for memory that is not backed by physical
> > > > memory, or kernel does not have access to.
> > > > Recently, there was a change which zeroed all memmap for all holes in
> > > > e820. Unfortunately, it introduced a bug that is discussed here:
> > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg156764.html
> > > > Linus, also saw this bug on his machine, and confirmed that reverting
> > > > commit 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into
> > > > memblock.reserved") fixes the issue.
> > > > The problem is that we incorrectly zero some struct pages after they
> > > > were setup.
> > > > The fix is to zero unavailable struct pages prior to initializing of
> > > > struct pages.
> > > > A more detailed fix should come later that would avoid double zeroing
> > > > cases: one in __init_single_page(), the other one in
> > > > zero_resv_unavail().
> > > > Fixes: 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > index 1521100f1e63..5d800d61ddb7 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > @@ -6847,6 +6847,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> > > > /* Initialise every node */
> > > > mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
> > > > setup_nr_node_ids();
> > > > + zero_resv_unavail();
> > > > for_each_online_node(nid) {
> > > > pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> > > > free_area_init_node(nid, NULL,
> > > > @@ -6857,7 +6858,6 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> > > > node_set_state(nid, N_MEMORY);
> > > > check_for_memory(pgdat, nid);
> > > > }
> > > > - zero_resv_unavail();
> > > > }
> > > > static int __init cmdline_parse_core(char *p, unsigned long *core,
> > > > @@ -7033,9 +7033,9 @@ void __init set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve)
> > > > void __init free_area_init(unsigned long *zones_size)
> > > > {
> > > > + zero_resv_unavail();
> > > > free_area_init_node(0, zones_size,
> > > > __pa(PAGE_OFFSET) >> PAGE_SHIFT, NULL);
> > > > - zero_resv_unavail();
> > > > }
> > > > static int page_alloc_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > So this patch breaks i386, ick. I'll wait for the fix to hit Linus's
> > tree as that's a bit more important to have the large majority of the
> > x86-64 boxes fixed with this patch for now.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
