On Fri 2018-07-13 15:33:58, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > > > > not to CFE? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. > > > > > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal > > > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET > > > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. > > > > > > Or something like that. > > > > Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number > > of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"? > > Erm, I wanted to say 'CFE', i.e. the abbreviation of 'Control Flow Enforcement'. > > But I guess I can live with CET as well ... Yeah, and I am trying to say that perhaps we should use something longer than three letters. It will make code longer but easier to read. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
