On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:24:44 -0400 Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/13/2018 09:17 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 04:37:26PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> >> +static void *sparsemap_buf __meminitdata;
> >> +static void *sparsemap_buf_end __meminitdata;
> >> +
> >> +void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid)
> >> +{
> >> + BUG_ON(sparsemap_buf);
> >
> > Why do we need a BUG_ON() here?
> > Looking at the code I cannot really see how we can end up with sparsemap_buf being NULL.
> > Is it just for over-protection?
>
> This checks that we do not accidentally leak memory by calling sparse_buffer_init() consequently without sparse_buffer_fini() in-between.
A memory leak isn't serious enough to justify crashing the kernel.
Therefore
--- a/mm/sparse.c~mm-sparse-abstract-sparse-buffer-allocations-fix-fix
+++ a/mm/sparse.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static void *sparsemap_buf_end __meminit
void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid)
{
- BUG_ON(sparsemap_buf);
+ WARN_ON(sparsemap_buf); /* forgot to call sparse_buffer_fini()? */
sparsemap_buf =
memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE,
__pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS),
_
