On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 04:54:49PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (07/04/18 10:03), Mike Rapoport wrote: > > arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > > arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c | 2 +- > > arch/microblaze/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +- > > arch/sparc/kernel/ds.c | 2 +- > > arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h | 2 +- > > arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 4 ++-- > > arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c | 2 +- > > Isn't it "funny" that parisc, ia64, powerpc don't use pf/pF in arch code, > but x86, arm, etc. do use pf/pF in arch code? > > Surely, I do understand why we have pf/pF in mm, drivers and all over the > place. But still, I'm surprised. That's because somebody (including you) did the conversion ;-) > -ss > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
