On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:51:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 04-07-18 15:43:35, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > > > index 03d48d8835ba..2acec4033389 100644 > > > --- a/mm/memblock.c > > > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > > > @@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, > > > * so we use WARN_ONCE() here to see the stack trace if > > > * fail happens. > > > */ > > > - WARN_ONCE(1, "memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotunplug may be affected\n"); > > > + WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE), > > > + "memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotremove may be affected\n"); > > > > nit: isn't the warning indented too much? > > this is what vim did for me. The string doesn't fit into 80 even if I > indented it to the first bracket. If you feel strongly I can do that > though. Not really. With wrapping if looks better like this :) > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
