On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:10:47 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, Andrew, > > this series is made on top of 4.18-rc1, while now I see "mm-list_lru-add-lock_irq-member-to-__list_lru_init.patch" > in mm tree, which conflicts with two of patches from series. Well, "mm: use irq locking suffix instead local_irq_disable()" is a fairly straightforward cleanup series, so it would be best to base your patches on that work, please. There is a significant review comment from Vladimir against "mm: list_lru: add lock_irq member to __list_lru_init()" to which Sebastian has yet to respond (please). > Should I rebase the series on top of current mm tree? What are you plans on this series? It looks like they're ready for an initial merge.
