On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 13:23 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Toshi, Thomas,
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:13:22PM +0000, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 16:56 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:13:47AM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > From: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The following kernel panic was observed on ARM64 platform due to a stale
> > > > TLB entry.
> > > >
> > > > 1. ioremap with 4K size, a valid pte page table is set.
> > > > 2. iounmap it, its pte entry is set to 0.
> > > > 3. ioremap the same address with 2M size, update its pmd entry with
> > > > a new value.
> > > > 4. CPU may hit an exception because the old pmd entry is still in TLB,
> > > > which leads to a kernel panic.
> > > >
> > > > Commit b6bdb7517c3d ("mm/vmalloc: add interfaces to free unmapped page
> > > > table") has addressed this panic by falling to pte mappings in the above
> > > > case on ARM64.
> > > >
> > > > To support pmd mappings in all cases, TLB purge needs to be performed
> > > > in this case on ARM64.
> > > >
> > > > Add a new arg, 'addr', to pud_free_pmd_page() and pmd_free_pte_page()
> > > > so that TLB purge can be added later in seprate patches.
> > >
> > > So I acked v13 of Chintan's series posted here:
> > >
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-June/582953.html
> > >
> > > any chance this lot could all be merged together, please?
> >
> > Chintan's patch 2/3 and 3/3 apply cleanly on top of my series. Can you
> > please coordinate with Thomas on the logistics?
>
> Sure. I guess having this series on a common branch that I can pull into
> arm64 and apply Chintan's other patches on top would work.
>
> How does that sound?
Should this go thru -mm tree then?
Andrew, Thomas, what do you think?
Thanks,
-Toshi
