On Wed 27-06-18 12:12:49, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> A lot of memory can be consumed by the events generated for the huge or
> unlimited queues if there is either no or slow listener. This can cause
> system level memory pressure or OOMs. So, it's better to account the
> fsnotify kmem caches to the memcg of the listener.
>
> However the listener can be in a different memcg than the memcg of the
> producer and these allocations happen in the context of the event
> producer. This patch introduces remote memcg charging API which the
> producer can use to charge the allocations to the memcg of the listener.
>
> There are seven fsnotify kmem caches and among them allocations from
> dnotify_struct_cache, dnotify_mark_cache, fanotify_mark_cache and
> inotify_inode_mark_cachep happens in the context of syscall from the
> listener. So, SLAB_ACCOUNT is enough for these caches.
>
> The objects from fsnotify_mark_connector_cachep are not accounted as they
> are small compared to the notification mark or events and it is unclear
> whom to account connector to since it is shared by all events attached to
> the inode.
>
> The allocations from the event caches happen in the context of the event
> producer. For such caches we will need to remote charge the allocations
> to the listener's memcg. Thus we save the memcg reference in the
> fsnotify_group structure of the listener.
>
> This patch has also moved the members of fsnotify_group to keep the size
> same, at least for 64 bit build, even with additional member by filling
> the holes.
...
> static int __init fanotify_user_setup(void)
> {
> - fanotify_mark_cache = KMEM_CACHE(fsnotify_mark, SLAB_PANIC);
> + fanotify_mark_cache = KMEM_CACHE(fsnotify_mark,
> + SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT);
> fanotify_event_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(fanotify_event_info, SLAB_PANIC);
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS)) {
> fanotify_perm_event_cachep =
Why don't you setup also fanotify_event_cachep and
fanotify_perm_event_cachep caches with SLAB_ACCOUNT and instead specify
__GFP_ACCOUNT manually? Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
