On Wed 13-06-18 05:55:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > It is not only the matter of the spinlocks. GFP_ATOMIC is not supported > > by the > > memory compaction code, which is used in alloc_contig_range(). Right, this > > should be also noted in the documentation. > > Documentation is good, asserts are better. The code should reject any > flag not explicitly supported, or even better have its own flags type > with the few actually supported flags. Agreed. Is the cma allocator used for anything other than GFP_KERNEL btw.? If not then, shouldn't we simply drop the gfp argument altogether rather than give users a false hope for differen gfp modes that are not really supported and grow broken code? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
