Re: [PATCH v2 03/40] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:24:45AM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 10:24:45 +0800
> From: Kenneth Lee <Kenneth-Lee-2012@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Philippe Brucker
>  <jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx>, "xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx"
>  <xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx" <xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon
>  <Will.Deacon@xxxxxxx>, "okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx"
>  <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, "ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx" <ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>,
>  "tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "joro@xxxxxxxxxx" <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "robdclark@xxxxxxxxx" <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>, "bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx"
>  <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>  <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx"
>  <liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rfranz@xxxxxxxxxx" <rfranz@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Jacob Pan
>  <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx"
>  <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx" <rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx" <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>  <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "shunyong.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>  <shunyong.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>  <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "liubo95@xxxxxxxxxx" <liubo95@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  "iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@xxxxxxx>, "christian.koenig@xxxxxxx"
>  <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>, "nwatters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>  <nwatters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>  <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/40] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces
> Message-ID: <20180526022445.GA6069@kllp05>
> 
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:39:59AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:39:59 +0100
> > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx>,
> >  "xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx" <xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx" <xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@xxxxxxx>, "okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx" <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, "ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx"
> >  <ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>, "tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "joro@xxxxxxxxxx" <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, "robdclark@xxxxxxxxx"
> >  <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>, "bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx" <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx" <liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rfranz@xxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <rfranz@xxxxxxxxxx>, "devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx"
> >  <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx" <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx" <rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx>, "thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "shunyong.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <shunyong.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "liubo95@xxxxxxxxxx" <liubo95@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  "iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >  Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@xxxxxxx>, "christian.koenig@xxxxxxx"
> >  <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>, "nwatters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <nwatters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> >  <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> >  kenneth-lee-2012@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/40] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces
> > Message-ID: <20180525093959.000040a7@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > +CC Kenneth Lee
> > 
> > On Fri, 25 May 2018 09:33:11 +0300
> > Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:04:39PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > On 24/05/18 12:50, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:  
> > > > >> Interesting, I hadn't thought about this use-case before. At first I
> > > > >> thought you were talking about mdev devices assigned to VMs, but I think
> > > > >> you're referring to mdevs assigned to userspace drivers instead? Out of
> > > > >> curiosity, is it only theoretical or does someone actually need this?  
> > > > > 
> > > > > There has been some non upstreamed efforts to have mdev and produce userspace
> > > > > drivers. Huawei is using it on what they call "wrapdrive" for crypto devices and
> > > > > we did a proof of concept for ethernet interfaces. At the time we choose not to
> > > > > involve the IOMMU for the reason you mentioned, but having it there would be
> > > > > good.  
> > > > 
> > > > I'm guessing there were good reasons to do it that way but I wonder, is
> > > > it not simpler to just have the kernel driver create a /dev/foo, with a
> > > > standard ioctl/mmap/poll interface? Here VFIO adds a layer of
> > > > indirection, and since the mediating driver has to implement these
> > > > operations already, what is gained?  
> > > The best reason i can come up with is "common code". You already have one API
> > > doing that for you so we replicate it in a /dev file?
> > > The mdev approach still needs extentions to support what we tried to do (i.e
> > > mdev bus might need yo have access on iommu_ops), but as far as i undestand it's
> > > a possible case.
> 
> Hi, Jean, Please allow me to share my understanding here:
> https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/35489035
> 
> The reason we do not use the /dev/foo scheme is that the devices to be
> shared are programmable accelerators. We cannot fix up the kernel driver for them.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jean  
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 			-Kenneth Lee (Hisilicon)

I just found this mail was missed in the mailing list. I tried it once
again.

-- 
			-Kenneth Lee (Hisilicon)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux