On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 20:41 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 09:40:02AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Peterz, isn't there some fancy better way we're supposed to handle the > > error return these days? > > Don't think so. I played with a few things but that never really went > anywhere. > > Also, both asm things look suspicously similar, it might make sense to > share. Also, maybe do the instruction .byte sequence in a #define INSN > or something. I will fix that.
