On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 04-06-18 17:23:06, Roman Gushchin wrote: > [...] > > I'm happy to discuss any concrete issues/concerns, but I really see > > no reasons to drop it from the mm tree now and start the discussion > > from scratch. > > I do not think this is ready for the current merge window. Sorry! I > would really prefer to see the whole thing in one series to have a > better picture. Please, provide any specific reason for that. I appreciate your opinion, but *I think* it's not an argument, seriously. We've discussed the patchset back to March and I made several iterations based on the received feedback. Later we had a separate discussion with Greg, who proposed an alternative solution, which, unfortunately, had some serious shortcomings. And, as I remember, some time ago we've discussed memory.min with you. And now you want to start from scratch without providing any reason. I find it counter-productive, sorry. Thanks!
