On Mon 04-06-18 20:13:44, 禹舟键 wrote: > Hi Michal > I will add the missing information in the cover-letter. I do not really think the cover letter needs much improvements. It is the patch description that should be as specific as possible. Cover letter should contain a highlevel description usually. > > That being said, I am ready to ack a patch which adds the memcg of the > > oom victim. I will not ack (nor nack) the patch which turns it into a > > single print because I am not sure the benefit is really worth it. Maybe > > others will though. > > OK, I will use the pr_cont_cgroup_name() to print origin and kill > memcg's name. I hope David will not have other opinions :) As I've said this can be always added on top pressuming there is a good justification. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
