On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:00:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Finding a buffer that isn't uptodate doesn't invalidate the mapping for
> any given block. The last_sector check will already take care of starting
> another ioend as soon as we find any non-update buffer, and if the current
> mapping doesn't include the next uptodate buffer the xfs_imap_valid check
> will take care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index cef2bc3cf98b..7dc13b0aae60 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -849,15 +849,12 @@ xfs_writepage_map(
> break;
>
> /*
> - * Block does not contain valid data, skip it, mark the current
> - * map as invalid because we have a discontiguity. This ensures
> - * we put subsequent writeable buffers into a new ioend.
> + * Block does not contain valid data, skip it.
> */
> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> if (PageUptodate(page))
> ASSERT(buffer_mapped(bh));
> uptodate = false;
> - wpc->imap_valid = false;
> continue;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
