Re: [PATCH] mm: convert scan_control.priority int => byte

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 07:40:25PM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Reclaim priorities range from 0..12(DEF_PRIORITY).
> scan_control.priority is a 4 byte int, which is overkill.
> 
> Since commit 6538b8ea886e ("x86_64: expand kernel stack to 16K") x86_64
> stack overflows are not an issue.  But it's inefficient to use 4 bytes
> for priority.

If you're looking to shave a few more bytes, allocation order can fit
in a u8 too (can't be more than 6 bits, and realistically won't be more
than 4 bits).  reclaim_idx likewise will fit in a u8, and actually won't
be more than 3 bits.

I am sceptical that nr_to_reclaim should really be an unsigned long; I
don't think we should be trying to free 4 billion pages in a single call.
nr_scanned might be over 4 billion (!) but nr_reclaimed can probably
shrink to unsigned int along with nr_to_reclaim.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux