Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 25-05-18 19:57:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Michal Hocko wrote: > > > What is wrong with the folliwing? should_reclaim_retry should be a > > > natural reschedule point. PF_WQ_WORKER is a special case which needs a > > > stronger rescheduling policy. Doing that unconditionally seems more > > > straightforward than depending on a zone being a good candidate for a > > > further reclaim. > > > > Where is schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) for !PF_KTHREAD threads? > > Re-read what I've said. Please show me as a complete patch. Then, I will test your patch.
