Re: [PATCHv2 13/24] sys_swapon: separate bdev claim and inode lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nit pick below

On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:

> Move the code which claims the bdev (S_ISBLK) or locks the inode
> (S_ISREG) to a separate function. Only code movement, no functional
> changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/swapfile.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 96be104..27faeec 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1889,6 +1889,43 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
>  	return p;
>  }
>  
> +static int claim_swapfile(struct swap_info_struct *p, struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	int error;
> +
> +	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
> +		p->bdev = bdgrab(I_BDEV(inode));
> +		error = blkdev_get(p->bdev,
> +				   FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_EXCL,
> +				   sys_swapon);
> +		if (error < 0) {
> +			p->bdev = NULL;
> +			error = -EINVAL;
> +			goto bad_swap;
> +		}
> +		p->old_block_size = block_size(p->bdev);
> +		error = set_blocksize(p->bdev, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		if (error < 0)
> +			goto bad_swap;
> +		p->flags |= SWP_BLKDEV;
> +	} else if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> +		p->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
> +		mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +		if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
> +			error = -EBUSY;
> +			goto bad_swap;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		error = -EINVAL;
> +		goto bad_swap;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +bad_swap:
> +	return error;
> +}
> +
>  SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
>  {
>  	struct swap_info_struct *p;
> @@ -1942,32 +1979,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
> -		p->bdev = bdgrab(I_BDEV(inode));
> -		error = blkdev_get(p->bdev,
> -				   FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_EXCL,
> -				   sys_swapon);
> -		if (error < 0) {
> -			p->bdev = NULL;
> -			error = -EINVAL;
> -			goto bad_swap;
> -		}
> -		p->old_block_size = block_size(p->bdev);
> -		error = set_blocksize(p->bdev, PAGE_SIZE);
> -		if (error < 0)
> -			goto bad_swap;
> -		p->flags |= SWP_BLKDEV;
> -	} else if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> -		p->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
> -		mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> -		if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
> -			error = -EBUSY;
> -			goto bad_swap;
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		error = -EINVAL;
> +	error = claim_swapfile(p, inode);
> +	if (unlikely(error))

As a personal preference, I don't use likely/unlikley unless I have a profiler
telling me that the compiler got it wrong.  Just a suggestion.

>  		goto bad_swap;
> -	}
>  
>  	swapfilepages = i_size_read(inode) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.4
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]