On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:36:00AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > + If the speculative page fault fails because of a concurrency is > > because a concurrency is While one can use concurrency as a noun, it sounds archaic to me. I'd rather: If the speculative page fault fails because a concurrent modification is detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet > > + detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet > > + allocating, it is failing its processing and a classic page fault > > allocated, the speculative page fault fails and a classic page fault > > > + is then tried.
