On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:12:44PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:43:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +struct pt_ptr {
> > + unsigned long *ptr;
> > + int lvl;
> > +};
>
> On x86, you've got three kinds of paging scheme, referred to in the manual
> as 32-bit, PAE and 4-level.
You forgot 5-level :)
(although it's not in the manual yet, so fair enough)
> On 32-bit, you've got 3 levels (Directory, Table and Entry), and you can
> encode those three levels in the bottom two bits of the pointer. With
> PAE and 4L, pointers are 64-bit aligned, so you can encode up to eight
> levels in the bottom three bits of the pointer.
I didn't thought about this. Thank you.
> > +struct pt_val {
> > + unsigned long val;
> > + int lvl;
> > +};
>
> I don't think it's possible to shrink this down to a single ulong.
> _Maybe_ it is if you can squirm a single bit free from the !pte_present
> case.
I don't think it worth it. It gets tricky quickly.
> ... this is only for x86 4L and maybe 32 paging, right? It'd need to
> use unsigned long val[2] for PAE.
I didn't look at 32-bit at all. But 4L and 5L [kinda] work.
> I'm going to think about this some more. There's a lot of potential here.
Thanks for the input.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
