On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:36:10PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ enum memcg_memory_event {
> MEMCG_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS,
> };
>
> +enum mem_cgroup_protection {
> + MEMCG_PROT_NONE,
> + MEMCG_PROT_LOW,
> + MEMCG_PROT_HIGH,
Ha, HIGH doesn't make much sense, but I went back and it's indeed what
I suggested. Must have been a brainfart. This should be
MEMCG_PROT_NONE,
MEMCG_PROT_LOW,
MEMCG_PROT_MIN
right? To indicate which type of protection is applying.
The rest of the patch looks good:
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
