Re: [PATCH v2] mm: access to uninitialized struct page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:26:58 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:26:19 -0400 Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The following two bugs were reported by Fengguang Wu:
> > 
> > kernel reboot-without-warning in early-boot stage, last printk:
> > early console in setup code
> > 
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418135300.inazvpxjxowogyge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/init/main.c
> > +++ b/init/main.c
> > @@ -585,8 +585,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
> >  	setup_log_buf(0);
> >  	vfs_caches_init_early();
> >  	sort_main_extable();
> > -	trap_init();
> >  	mm_init();
> > +	trap_init();
> >  
> >  	ftrace_init();  
> 
> Gulp.  Let's hope that nothing in mm_init() requires that trap_init()
> has been run.  What happens if something goes wrong during mm_init()
> and the architecture attempts to raise a software exception, hits a bus
> error, div-by-zero, etc, etc?  Might there be hard-to-discover
> dependencies in such a case?

I mentioned the same thing.

-- Steve




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux