On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 03:42:41 +0400 Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > These two patches were written in preparation for the creation of > protectable memory, however their use is not limited to pmalloc and can > improve the use of virtally contigous memory. > > The first provides a faster path from struct page to the vm_struct that > tracks it. > > The second patch renames a single linked list field inside of vmap_area. > The list is currently used only for disposing of the data structure, once > it is not in use anymore. > Which means that it cold be used for other purposes while it'not queued > for destruction. The patches look benign to me (feel free to add my ack), but I'm not seeing a reason to apply them at this time?
