Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 08:30:43AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 04/28/2018 12:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > In the above kernel that was missing the PROT_EXEC fix I was repeatedly running 
> > the 64-bit and 32-bit testcases as non-root and as root as well, until I got a 
> > hang in the middle of a 32-bit test running as root:
> > 
> >   test  7 PASSED (iteration 19)
> >   test  8 PASSED (iteration 19)
> >   test  9 PASSED (iteration 19)
> > 
> >   < test just hangs here >
> 
> For the hang, there is a known issue with the use of printf() in the
> signal handler and a resulting deadlock.  I *thought* there was a patch
> merged to fix this from Ram Pai or one of the other IBM folks.

Yes. there is a patch. unfortunately that patch assumes the selftest has
been moved into selftests/vm directory.  One option is --  I merge your
changes in my selftest patchset, and send the entire series for upstream
merge.

Or you can manually massage-in the specific fix.
The patch is "selftests/vm: Fix deadlock in protection_keys.c"
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/864394/

Let me know,
-- 
Ram Pai




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux