On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote: > The SLAB and SLUB patches are fine by me if there are going to be real > users for this. Christoph, Paul? The solution is a bit overkill. It would be much simpler to add a union to struct page that has lru and the rcu in there similar things can be done for SLAB and the network layer. A similar issue already exists for the spinlock in struct page. Lets follow the existing way of handling this. Struct page may be larger for debugging purposes already because of the need for extended spinlock data. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>