On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > Don't show nr_indirectly_reclaimable in /proc/vmstat, > > > because there is no need in exporting this vm counter > > > to the userspace, and some changes are expected > > > in reclaimable object accounting, which can alter > > > this counter. > > > > > > > I don't think it should be a per-node vmstat, in this case. It appears > > only to be used for the global context. Shouldn't this be handled like > > totalram_pages, total_swap_pages, totalreserve_pages, etc? > > Hi, David! > > I don't see any reasons why re-using existing infrastructure for > fast vm counters is bad, and why should we re-invent it for this case. > Because now you have to modify the existing infrastructure for something that shouldn't be a vmstat in the first place?
