Re: [LSF/MM] schedule suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:26:10PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:

> Basicly i want a callback in __fd_install(), do_dup2(), dup_fd() and
> add void * *private_data; to struct fdtable (also a default array to
> struct files_struct). The callback would be part of struct file_operations.
> and only call if it exist (os overhead is only for device driver that
> care).

Hell, *NO*.  This is insane - you would need to maintain extra counts
("how many descriptors refer to this struct file... for this descriptor
table").

Besides, _what_ private_data?  What would own and maintain it?  A specific
driver?  What if more than one of them wants that thing?
 
> Did i miss something fundamental ? copy_files() call dup_fd() so i
> should be all set here.

That looks like an extremely misguided kludge for hell knows what purpose,
almost certainly architecturally insane.  What are you actually trying to
achieve?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux