On Tue 10-04-18 04:56:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:59:03AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Okay, I hope this version clear current concerns. > > It doesn't. The right place to warn about GFP_ZERO used with a > constructor is _slab_, like the patch I already sent. We have no idea > what other places might have the same bug, and slab is the only place > to catch that. I agree with that. Radix tree shouldn't be really that special. I would rather get rid of the ctor subtle thingy but if we absolutely have to keep it then the GFP_RECLAIM_MASK filtering and a warning in slab for __GFP_ZERO looks like a reasonable step forward. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
