On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:00 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 09-04-18 04:46:22, Bart Van Assche wrote: > [...] > [...] > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c b/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c > > index ad8a125defdd..3ddb464b72e6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c > > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c > > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int generic_ide_resume(struct device *dev) > > > > memset(&rqpm, 0, sizeof(rqpm)); > > rq = blk_get_request_flags(drive->queue, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, > > - BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT); > > + BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT, __GFP_RECLAIM); > > Is there any reason to use __GFP_RECLAIM directly. I guess you wanted to > have GFP_NOIO semantic, right? So why not be explicit about that. Same > for other instances of this flag in the patch Hello Michal, Thanks for the review. The use of __GFP_RECLAIM in this code (which was called __GFP_WAIT in the past) predates the git history. In other words, it was introduced before kernel version 2.6.12 (2005). So I'm reluctant to make such a change in the IDE code. But I will make that change in the SCSI code. Bart.