Re: Why the kernel needs `split_mem_range` to split the physical address range?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why the kernel needs `split_mem_range` to split the physical address range?
From: Hao Lee <haolee.swjtu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 19:25:46 +0800
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180401130607.GG13332@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <CA+PpKPnOn9GLSfHUCNPSqLQUs0ySN_oCLDmBA_KG59iEpcS71Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180401130607.GG13332@bombadil.infradead.org>

Hi, Matthew

Many thanks for your prompt reply. Your explanation is very clear and
easy to understand. It helps me a lot!

Regards,
Hao Lee

References:
- Why the kernel needs `split_mem_range` to split the physical address range?
  - From: Hao Lee
- Re: Why the kernel needs `split_mem_range` to split the physical address range?
  - From: Matthew Wilcox

Prev by Date: Re: general protection fault in kernfs_kill_sb
Next by Date: [PATCH v3 6/6] Enable KASan for arm
Previous by thread: Re: Why the kernel needs `split_mem_range` to split the physical address range?
Next by thread: general protection fault in kernfs_kill_sb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux