Re: [PATCH 6/8] Add __GFP_OTHER_NODE flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




You could make the same argument for anything using kmalloc_node() since
preferred_zone may very well not be on the allocating cpu's node.

You're right. It is not always, that is why I defined a new flag. In the cases where the flag
is passed it is.



  So you
either define NUMA_LOCAL to account for when a cpu allocates memory local
to itself (as it's name implies) or you define it to account for when
memory comes from the preferred_zone's node as determined by the zonelist.

That's already numa_hit as you say.

I just don't think "local to some random kernel daemon that means nothing to the user"
is a useful definition for local_hit.

When I defined the counter I intended it to be local to the user process. It always was like
that too, just THP changed the rules.

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]