Re: [PATCH 3/6] Protectable Memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:55:21AM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> +static inline void *pmalloc_array_align(struct pmalloc_pool *pool,
> +					size_t n, size_t size,
> +					short int align_order)
> +{

You're missing:

        if (size != 0 && n > SIZE_MAX / size)
                return NULL;

> +	return pmalloc_align(pool, n * size, align_order);
> +}

> +static inline void *pcalloc_align(struct pmalloc_pool *pool, size_t n,
> +				  size_t size, short int align_order)
> +{
> +	return pzalloc_align(pool, n * size, align_order);
> +}

Ditto.

> +static inline void *pcalloc(struct pmalloc_pool *pool, size_t n,
> +			    size_t size)
> +{
> +	return pzalloc_align(pool, n * size, PMALLOC_ALIGN_DEFAULT);
> +}

If you make this one:

	return pcalloc_align(pool, n, size, PMALLOC_ALIGN_DEFAULT)

then you don't need the check in this function.

Also, do we really need 'align' as a parameter to the allocator functions
rather than to the pool?

I'd just reuse ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from slab.h as the alignment, and
then add the special alignment options when we have a real user for them.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux