Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_owner: ignore everything below the IRQ entry point

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:47:17 +0530 Vaneet Narang <v.narang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> >Every user of stack_depot should filter out irq frames, without that
> >stack_depot will run out of memory sooner or later. so this is a
> >change in the right direction.
> > 
> >Do we need to define empty version of in_irqentry_text? Shouldn't only
> >filter_irq_stacks be used by kernel code?
> 
> We thought about this but since we were adding both the APIs filter_irq_stacks & in_irqentry_text 
> in header file so we thought of defining empty definition for both as both the APIs are accessible
> to the module who is going to include header file.
> 
> If you think empty definition of in_irqentry_text() is not requited then we will modify & resend the
> patch.
> 

filter_irq_stacks() is too large to be inlined.

The CONFIG_STACKTRACE=n versions should be regular C functions, not
macros.  But stacktrace.c decided to do them all as macros,
unfortunately.

in_irqentry_text() is probably too large to be inlined as well, and
should return bool.

Declarations for __irqentry_text_start and friends already exist in
include/asm-generic/sections.h (and, for some reason, also in
arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h) and should not be duplicated in
include/linux/stacktrace.h.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux