On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:54:06AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > Andrea, after playing with this for a week or two, I'm quite a bit > > more confident that it's not causing much harm. Seems a fairly > > low-risk feature. Could we stick these somewhere so they'll at > > least hit linux-next for the 2.6.40 cycle perhaps? > > I think they're good to go in mmotm already and to be merged ASAP. > > The only minor issue I have is the increment, to become per-cpu. Are > we going to change its location then or it's still read through sysfs? > Dave, I notice these patches haven't been merged into -mm yet. Are we waiting on another iteration or is this set ready to go? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>