On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:36:52AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Christopher Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> > >> >> However for SLUB in debug kernel, the sizes were same. On further >> >> inspection it is found that SLUB always use kmem_cache.object_size to >> >> measure the kmem_cache.size while SLAB use the given kmem_cache.size. In >> >> the debug kernel the slab's size can be larger than its object_size. >> >> Thus in the creation of non-root slab, the SLAB uses the root's size as >> >> base to calculate the non-root slab's size and thus non-root slab's size >> >> can be larger than the root slab's size. For SLUB, the non-root slab's >> >> size is measured based on the root's object_size and thus the size will >> >> remain same for root and non-root slab. >> > >> > Note that the object_size and size may differ for SLUB based on kernel >> > parameters and slab configuration. For SLAB these are compilation options. >> > >> >> Thanks for the explanation. >> >> >> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *find_mergeable(unsigned int size, unsigned int align, >> >> } >> >> >> >> static struct kmem_cache *create_cache(const char *name, >> >> - unsigned int object_size, unsigned int size, unsigned int align, >> >> + unsigned int object_size, unsigned int align, >> >> slab_flags_t flags, unsigned int useroffset, >> > >> > Why was both the size and object_size passed during cache creation in the >> > first place? From the flags etc the slab logic should be able to compute >> > the actual bytes required for each object and its metadata. >> > >> >> +Vladimir >> >> I think it was introduced by 794b1248be4e7 ("memcg, slab: separate >> memcg vs root cache creation paths") but I could not find out the >> reason. > > This was a mistake - I missed that __kmem_cache_create() overwrites > kmem_cache->size. Thanks for fixing this. Thanks for confirming. Andrew, can you please add following line to the patch commit message. Fixes: 794b1248be4e ("memcg, slab: separate memcg vs root cache creation paths")