Anyone object to us merging the following patch via the powerpc tree? Full series is here if anyone's interested: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=28377&state=* cheers Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This will be used by powerpc to allocate per-cpu stacks and other > data structures node-local where possible. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/memblock.h | 5 ++++- > mm/memblock.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index 8be5077efb5f..8cab51398705 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -316,9 +316,12 @@ static inline bool memblock_bottom_up(void) > #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE (~(phys_addr_t)0) > #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE 0 > > -phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, > +phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, > phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, > ulong flags); > +phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, > + phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr, > + int nid, ulong flags); > phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, > phys_addr_t max_addr); > phys_addr_t __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 5a9ca2a1751b..cea2af494da0 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, > flags); > } > > -static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, > +phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, > phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr, > int nid, ulong flags) > { > -- > 2.16.1
