On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:18:21PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Otherwise, yes, please. We could build a coccinelle rule for > > additional replacements... > > A potential semantic patch and the changes it generates are attached > below. Himanshu Jha helped with its development. Working on this > uncovered one bug, where the allocated array is too large, because the > size provided for it was a structure size, but actually only pointers to > that structure were to be stored in it. This is cool! Thanks for doing the coccinelle patch! Diffstat: 50 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-) I find that pretty compelling. I'll repost the kvmalloc_struct patch imminently.
