Re: [RFC, PATCH 21/22] x86/mm: Introduce page_keyid() and page_encrypted()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/06/2018 12:57 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:08:53AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 08:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> +static inline bool page_encrypted(struct page *page)
>>> +{
>>> +	/* All pages with non-zero KeyID are encrypted */
>>> +	return page_keyid(page) != 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> Is this true?  I thought there was a KEYID_NO_ENCRYPT "Do not encrypt
>> memory when this KeyID is in use."  Is that really only limited to key 0.
> 
> Well, it depends on what we mean by "encrypted". For memory management
> pruposes we care if the page is encrypted with KeyID different from
> default one. All pages with non-default KeyID threated the same by memory
> management.

Doesn't it really mean "am I able to use the direct map to get this
page's contents?"

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux