Re: [RFC, PATCH 19/22] x86/mm: Implement free_encrypt_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 05:52:44AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/06/2018 12:54 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> Have you measured how slow this is?
> > No, I have not.
> 
> It would be handy to do this.  I *think* you can do it on normal
> hardware, even if it does not have "real" support for memory encryption.
>  Just don't set the encryption bits in the PTEs but go through all the
> motions of cache flushing.

Yes, allocation/freeing and KeyID interfaces can be tested with MKTME
support in hardware. I did most of my testing this way.

> I think that will help tell us whether this is a really specialized
> thing a la hugetlbfs or whether it's something we really want to support
> as a first-class citizen in the VM.

I will benchmark this. But not right now.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux