Re: [Question PATCH 0/1] mm: crash in vmalloc_to_page - misuse or bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping?

The kernel test automation seems to confirm my findings:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=151999308428656&w=2

Is this really a bug?

On 22/02/18 16:13, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> While trying to change the code of find_vm_area, I got an automated
> notification that my code was breaking the testing of i386, based on the
> 0-day testing automation from 01.org
> 
> I started investigating the issue and noticed that it seems to be
> reproducible also on top of plain 4.16-rc2, without any of my patches.
> 
> I'm still not 100% sure that I'm doing something sane, but I thought it
> might be good to share the finding.
> 
> The patch contains both a minimal change, to trigger the crash, and a
> snippet of the log of the crash i get.
> 
> Igor Stoppa (1):
>   crash vmalloc_to_page()
> 
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


--
igor

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux