Re: [PATCH 2/7] genalloc: selftest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/26/18 4:11 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:

On 24/02/18 00:42, J Freyensee wrote:
+	locations[action->location] = gen_pool_alloc(pool, action->size);
+	BUG_ON(!locations[action->location]);
Again, I'd think it through if you really want to use BUG_ON() or not:

https://lwn.net/Articles/13183/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/1
Is it acceptable to display only a WARNing, in case of risking damaging
a mounted filesystem?

That's a good question.  Based upon those articles, 'yes'.  But it seems like a 'darned-if-you-do, darned-if-you-don't' question as couldn't you also corrupt a mounted filesystem by crashing the kernel, yes/no?

If you really want a system crash, maybe just do a panic() like filesystems also use?

--
igor

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux