Re: [PATCH 01/11] ACPI / APEI: Move the estatus queue code up, and under its own ifdef

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:02:21PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> Sure. I reckon your English grammar is better than mine, is this better?:

Bah, you must be joking :-)

> | In any NMI-like handler, memory from ghes_estatus_pool is used to save
> | estatus, and added to the ghes_estatus_llist. irq_work_queue() causes
> | ghes_proc_in_irq() to run in IRQ context where each estatus in
> | ghes_estatus_llist are processed. Each NMI-like error source must grow

s/are/is/ reads better to me, for some reason :)

> | the ghes_estatus_pool to ensure memory is available.

Other than that, yap, much better!

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux